The first night we had digital cable (and great video channels), the movie 'The Wall' played. At my son's insistence, I watched it (with the music through the stereo speakers).
It is an excellent film and I recommend it.
Disturbing but excellent.
The middle 3 songs, as you can see, were from Syd Barrett. His story is one that is not all that uncommon in the world of creative souls.
Remember when you were young, You shone like the sun. Shine on you
crazy diamond. Now there's a look in your eyes, Like black holes in the
sky. Shine on you crazy diamond. Pink Floyd's tribute to Syd Barrett on Wish You Were Here, 1975
Syd Barrett, above. Words can't convey it. The eyes completely reveal the inner workings of genius and the over-the-top condition which we fall to so easily.
I received a response from our mayor regarding the gang problem, which I'm not sure she quite accepts as a reality. I must do some research about gang injunctions. Some citizens feel we need one, some absolutely refuse it (lest SB get a bad reputation).
This town gets compared to some places that supposedly have no place like some of our streets which might be considered undesirable. The word snooty comes to mind. SB has always had it's share of wealthy and destitute. It's not meant to be some haven for the rich, as some "new locals" might think.
Yes, Ganna Walska lived here and she was rich, but on her property near the RR tracks there was a little community known as "Hobo Village" or "Hobo Town", as per her approval. She would, as I understand it, make sure the guys all had the necessities, too. Cool lady. Her property is now known as Lotusland and is visited by school children and tourists constantly.
After thinking long and hard about it, I signed up for a cable company's 'bundle' - the 3 services, phone, high-speed internet, and good cable TV. Now we can see old cartoons (like Popeye!) and watch 'The Wall' while hearing the music and sound from the stereo speakers!! Gotta' love it.
I don't care who it's through or why, the day of installation and the few days after can be a drag to go through. Especially when sleep deprived because of a rat in the house. I must say that I was in a state of 'shock and awe' at how quickly the change over was done, though. Since I already had several computers here, we were set with a router with connection to each one. The man who did the work was here for less than one hour!
I wish everyone a fun weekend! I'll see you Saturday night, maybe?
Last week in the Senate, conservatives denied the will of the American
people by filibustering a measure to end the war in Iraq.
Unfortunately, such obstructionism has become a hallmark of this new
Congress. In the first seven months of the 110th Congress,
conservatives have acted to obstruct legislation at a rate greater than
in any previous Congress. While the House has successfully acted on a
number of pressing issues, conservatives in the Senate have blocked
legislation via filibuster 42 times, embracing a tactic they once
threatened to eliminate. In the few instances where Congress has been
able to overcome the politically- motivated obstruction, President Bush
-- who demanded in January that Congress not "play politics as usual"
-- has used the 110th Congress to score political points by vetoing
legislation backed by the majority of the American people. Senate
Minority Whip Trent Lott (R-MS) boasted recently, "The strategy of
being obstructionist can work or fail...and so far it's working."
PROGRESS IN THE HOUSE: Since Nov. 2006, the House successfully passed
several key pieces of legislation. In fact, in the first 100 hours, the
House acted to expand embryonic stem cell research, increase the
minimum wage, allow the government to negotiate lower prescription drug
prices, cut interest rates on student loans, end subsidies for big oil,
and enact the remaining 9/11 Commission recommendations -- all of which
are supported by a majority of the Americans. In addition, on two
occasions, the House has passed binding measures to end the war in
Iraq, a measure supported overwhelmingly by both the American people
and the troops on the ground. Even with such progress, House
conservatives are still doing their part to obstruct legislation, often
using a legislative device known as a "motion to recommit." A common
tactic in the 110th Congress, "[t]he strategy is to institute a
divisive change to the bill at the last moment, often unrelated to the
original intent of the legislation, hoping that the altered bill can
then be defeated on final passage."
OBSTRUCTION IN THE SENATE: Despite such progress in the House, a group
of right-wing senators have acted to obstruct "almost every bill that
has come before the Senate -- even ones with wide bipartisan support."
Of the six major pieces of legislation passed by the House in the first
100 hours, "only one has become law" -- primarily due to conservative
obstructionism in the Senate, a tactic that Weekly Standard Editor Fred
Barnes touts as a success. On legislation related to such issues as
reforming Medicare, raising the minimum wage, reforming union
formation, and ending the war in Iraq, conservatives have obstructed
progress by forcing bills to garner a supermajority of 60 votes to end
debate and vote on the bill itself. Without the votes to overcome such
a filibuster, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) is frequently
forced to withdraw bills from consideration, often in spite of the fact
that the majority of the Senate and the House support the measures.
Conservatives have used such "petty" and divisive tactics again and
again. According to McClatchy, Senate conservatives "are threatening
filibusters to block more legislation than ever before." Just seven
months into the 110th Congress's two-year term, legislation in the
Senate has been slowed or blocked completely by conservative
filibusters a total of 42 times amounting to "[n]early 1 in 6 roll-call
votes in the Senate this year." If the current pace continues, by Jan.
2009, conservatives in the Senate will have attempted to filibuster
more than 150 times -- nearly three times more than any Congress in the
last 50 years. In comparison, legislation was delayed or blocked by
filibuster only 52 times in the whole 109th Congress.
VETOES FROM THE WHITE HOUSE: In a "streak unmatched in modern American
history," Bush refused to veto a single piece of legislation in the
first five years of his presidency. Since Nov. 2006, when conservatives
were forced into the minority, the President has executed what
conservative columnist Robert Novak has termed a "veto offensive." With
just 18 months left in his presidency, Bush has used the Congress time
after time to score political points. This year alone, the President
vetoed a measure that would have ended the war in Iraq and legislation
that would have repealed current "restrictions on human embryonic stem
cell experiments. " Both proposals enjoyed broad support from the
American people. Progress is further endangered by over 30 other veto
threats. So committed is Bush to the politics of the radical right, he
has even threatened to veto the highly popular and bipartisan renewal
and expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program, which
would provide health care for up to nine million uninsured children.
But Bush's veto spree may be reaching its limits. Sen. Orrin Hatch
(R-UT), a reliable Bush ally, predicted, "[T]here is a reasonable
chance [the President's veto would] be overridden."
IRAQ -- PRES. CLINTON: EDELMAN IS AN 'IDEOLOGICAL HOLDOVER' FROM
CHENEY'S INNER CIRCLE: On Saturday, former President Bill Clinton
sharply criticized Under Secretary of Defense Eric Edelman, who
recently rebuffed Sen. Hillary Clinton's (D-NY) request for Pentagon
briefings to Congress on the administration' s redeployment plans. In a
letter to Clinton, Edelman wrote, "premature and public discussion of
the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq reinforces enemy propaganda."
Edelman's position is directly contradicted by Defense Secretary Robert
Gates, who testified that debate over Iraq redeployment has been
"helpful in bringing pressure to bear on the Maliki government."
Interviewed by ABC News, the former president "called Edelman 'one of
the more ideological holdovers' in the Defense Department." "I think
it's wrong to politicize national security," Clinton added. In the
first Bush administration, Edelman, serving under then-Secretary of
Defense Dick Cheney, was part of a "shop" set up to "think about
American foreign policy after the Cold War, at the grand strategic
level." The project also included Paul Wolfowitz and Scooter Libby [New
Yorker, 4/1/02]. From 2001-2003, Edelman served as a national security
adviser to Cheney. In 2003, he was named as U.S. ambassador to Turkey,
where he attempted to convince Turkey to cooperate with the Bush
administration' s plans to invade Iraq. Turkish columnist Ibrahim
Karagul noted, "Edelman is probably the least-least liked and trusted
American ambassador in Turkish history." In 2005, President Bush recess
appointed Edelman to replace Douglas Feith. Additionally, Edelman came
up with the idea of leaking information to the press as a way to rebut
Amb. Joe Wilson's public criticisms of the administration' s case for
war. After Scooter Libby was convicted of obstructing the probe into
who leaked the name of Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, Edelman wrote a
letter of leniency praising Libby's "loyalty to individuals. "
RADICAL RIGHT -- WHITE HOUSE LAVISHES BASELESS PRAISE ON
NEOCONSERVATIVE COLUMNIST KRISTOL: Last week, Weekly Standard columnist
Bill Kristol penned an op-ed in the Washington Post heaping praise on
the presidency of George W. Bush, claiming, "I suppose I'll merely
expose myself to harmless ridicule if I make the following assertion:
George W. Bush's presidency will probably be a successful one." Kristol
lauded Bush for his neutering of Medicare, the appointment of
right-wing Supreme Court justices John Roberts and Samuel Alito, and
even claimed that "we now seem to be on course to a successful outcome"
in Iraq. Today, Washington Post reporter Howard Kurtz reveals that Bush
was pleasantly surprised by Kristol's op-ed and "read the July 15
Outlook article that morning and recommended it to his staff."
Increasingly, only fringe elements of the conservative movement like
Kristol are lauding Bush's presidential tenure. A new Gallup Poll shows
that the latest quarterly approving rating of Bush's presidency is "the
worst he has had," with a string of sub-40 percent quarterly approval
ratings now exceeding the run that former President Nixon had leading
up to to his resignation. Furthermore, only 26 percent of Americans
think the country is "on the right track." Kristol's ties to the White
House have been long-standing, as he has been a close media ally of the
White House on issues ranging from Iraq to Iran to the CIA leak
scandal. Most recently, he accurately predicted Bush's commutation of
Scooter Libby. White House aide Pete Wehner recently defended Kristol
as "intellectually independent and intellectually courageous."
IRAQ -- NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE DIRECTOR: BUSH ADMINISTRATION MANIPULATED
IRAQ INTELLIGENCE: A new biography on Vice President Dick Cheney by
Weekly Standard staff writer Stephen F. Hayes contains some "revealing
nuggets" about the infamously secretive Vice President. On Meet the
Press this weekend, host Tim Russert highlighted a passage that said
current Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Mike McConnell "was
honored to be asked [to be DNI], but he had serious reservations. He
had been unimpressed with many aspects of the Bush administration and
its conduct of the war on terror, particularly what he felt was a
politicized use of intelligence in the lead-up to the Iraq war."
McConnell reportedly "seemed to side with those who believe that the
administration manipulated intelligence on Iraq for political purposes
before the 2003 invasion." Specifically, McConnell decried the
"secondary unit" established within the Pentagon to "reinterpret
information" prior to the war. An internal Pentagon investigation
released in February revealed that former Undersecretary of Defense
Doug Feith utilized the Counter-Terrorism Evaluation Group within the
Pentagon to create and promote false links between Iraq and al Qaeda.
Then-Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz "asked Feith's analysts to
ignore the intelligence community's belief that the militant Islamist
al-Qaida and Saddam's secular dictatorship were unlikely allies."
Subsequently, Feith "disseminated alternative intelligence assessments
on the Iraq and al-Qaida relationship. ..to senior decision-makers. "
Despite the overwhelming problems with both the intelligence that led
to the Iraq war and the war's execution, Cheney still maintains that
Rumsfeld was a "great secretary of defense." According to Hayes, he
"absolutely" did not agree with the President's decision to fire
Rumsfeld.
Many Blogstream members are there
already! Quotes from members: "It's like blog lite!" -- "I like the instant
gratification!" -- "Stop spectating, get in the game!"
If you have not joined in, you are really missing out!